Loan Review – May 2017

Monthly Commentary

June 13, 2017

In many respects little changed in the loan universe between April and May. Index prices have remained flat for two consecutive months and returns mirrored coupon payments. New issuance volume continued to decline while inflows to retail funds produced their 11th consecutive positive month and CLO volumes registered roughly $10 billion of inflows for the second consecutive month.

What did change in May was the magnitude of the spread compression in the primary market, which was truly astonishing. In April, year-to-date double B spreads had already compressed -6.6% from year-end while single B spreads slightly widened 1.5%. However, in May, double B and single B spreads tightened -4.2% and -10.4% month-over-month. The stair-step function in coupon decline in the primary market generally begets more re-pricing volume and this is exactly what the market has witnessed in early June.

From an index spread perspective, the Credit Suisse LELI index tightened 7 basis points to 3.70% during the month, which is a new post-crisis tight.

Loan Spreads Hit New Tights in May

Source: Credit Suisse

It is hard to reconcile the spread compression with the general news flow. Uncertainty in Britain, North Korea and Qatar combined with political gridlock and slow growth in the United States would all suggest a greater risk premium for risk assets. However, loans continue to grind tighter. While several sectors seem to face structural headwinds, market participants gain some comfort by the low default rate.


In May 2017, the Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index (“CS LLI”) was up 0.38% and the S&P Leveraged Loan Index (“S&P/LSTA”) was up 0.37%.

  • Year-to-date ending May 31, 2017, the CS LLI was up 2.03% and the S&P/LSTA was up 1.96%.
  • For the 12 months ending May 31, 2017, the CS LLI was up 7.59% and the S&P/LSTA was up 7.49%.

Sector Performance

All but three sectors had positive returns with the worst performing sectors being: Utilities (-0.46%), Energy (-0.30%) and Metals (-0.03%). Utilities continued to be weak as a result of softness in the independent power sector while Energy declined in sympathy with crude prices falling -2.6% on the month. Metals eroded as well based on general commodity weakness.

Retail, Aerospace and Services were the top performing sectors for the month of May with returns of 0.84%, 0.62%, and 0.57% respectively. Surprisingly, Retail had its best month of the year bouncing back with a positive return for the second consecutive month. Despite positive performance, most retailers are still trying to learn to compete in a market with a rapidly changing landscape.

On a year-to-date basis, the commodity driven sectors of Energy and Metals are still outperforming by a substantial amount and Utilities and Retailers have provided the weakest returns.

Total Return by Sector

Source: Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index

The flow-name prices in the S&P Index below illustrate overall index performance during the month. Prices spiked in the beginning of the month before stabilizing at these higher levels. However, improving prices of large, liquid loans have made it easier for smaller issuers to launch re-pricings during the month.

Average Loan Flow-Name Bid

Source: S&P Leveraged Loan Index

The average bid of the broader loan index remained relatively flat during the months of April and May after a torrid pace of price appreciation since the first quarter of 2016.

Average Bid of the S&P/LSTA Index

Source: S&P Leveraged Loan Index

Technical Conditions

CLO new issue supply reached $9.8 billion in May for the second largest inflow of CLO monthly demand on the year, following April’s CLO inflow of $10.2 billion. Retail inflows declined to their lowest total since August 2016. Slowing retail inflows ($1.3 billion) reflect a change in sentiment concerning the prospect of rising rates. As rising rate fears moderate, so too do the inflows to retail loan funds. However, it appears that high yield crossover demand as well as traditional banks are more than offsetting declining retail inflows.

New issue volumes dropped to $22.8 billion from $44.3 billion in the previous month and provided the lowest monthly output in the last 12 months.

Leveraged Loan Volume

Source: LCD, an offering of S&P Global Market Intelligence

Scarce supply helped keep prices stable and allow for the magnitude of spread compression.

Acquisitions, mergers and leveraged buyouts contributed to less than half of the institutional new issue volume in May and YTD. The remaining portion was largely made up from opportunistic transactions, borrowers’ extending maturities, repricing coupons and taking dividends.

YTD Institutional Volume

Source: LevFin Quarterly

While the retail market has slowed, CLO flows continue to contribute to overall demand. With $10.0 billion of the total $11.2 billion of inflows in May, CLO demand provided a stable environment to produce positive returns. After inflows peaked in December 2016, trailing 12-month returns peaked in February 2017. As inflows have moderated in 2017 so have trailing 12-month returns in March, April and May. With little opportunity for price increases, returns now are driven by coupon.

Inflows and Rolling LTM Returns

Source: LCD, an offering of S&P Global Market Intelligence

Spreads continue to tighten at an astonishing rate. Year-to-date, single B loans have tightened -9.0%, primarily as a result of the -10.4% tightening in May. Double B’s have tightened -10.5% year-to-date and -4.2% in May.

Spread Changes

Source: LCD Loanstats TrendLines

Average new issue yields continue to grind tighter and Double B and Single B yields are roughly 66 and 77 basis points tighter than June 2016, respectively.

Average New-Issue Yields

Source: LCD, an offering of S&P Global Market Intelligence

There have been 19 defaults in the last 12 months with three in May: Mood Media, Rue 21 and AF Global. The LTM default rate decreased slightly from 1.37% to 1.17%, based on a number of defaults, while the default rate decreased from 1.43% to 1.29% based on par amount outstanding. Regardless of measurement, default rates remain very low on a historical basis.

Lagging 12-Month Default Rates

Source: LCD Loan Stats
* Shadow default rate includes potential defaults, including those companies that have engaged bankruptcy advisors, performing loans with SD or D corporate rating and those paying default interest.

Commodity sectors continue to be the largest contributor to the default rate, however, just five of 19 defaults that have occurred in the last 12 months are Energy and Metals related borrowers. This is the lowest reading in the last several years. Retail/Restaurants is the second largest contributor with four defaults.

Shadow default activity remains very low, suggesting that there will not be any broad-based increase in the next 12 months.


Since 1992, the average 3-year discount margin (“DM”) for the CS LLI, is 463 basis points. If the global financial crisis (2008 & 2009) is excluded, the 3-year discount margin for the CS LLI is 416 basis points. At month end, the 3-year DM was tight to the historical average, at 434 basis points and 6 basis points tighter than the prior month.

The DM spread differential between double Bs and single Bs widened by 11 basis points from June 2016 to May 2017. However, it is still 30 basis points tight of the historical spread differential.

3-Year Discount Margin Differential Between BBs and Single Bs

Source: Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index

CS LLI Snapshot

Source: Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index


As of May 31, the imputed default rate for the S&P/LSTA Index was 1.77%, the lowest level since December 2007. It remained considerably below the multi-year high of 7.3%, set in February 2016. One would think that the spread tightening that has taken place in the last 12 months, and accelerated in May, would suggest that loan earnings are improving. There has not been a concurrent level of earnings improvement and other than a low trailing 12 month default rate, it is difficult to point to a fundamental reason for the spread compression. In fact, sector concerns in Energy, Metals, Utilities, Retail and a handful of pharmaceutical borrowers have witnessed increased stresses. Despite so much unease in so many sectors, year-to-date re-pricing activity has been aggressive and underwriting standards have declined. While the number of re-pricings moderated in May from prior months, the magnitude of the spread decline in deals that were repriced was the largest of the year. This would suggest we should see an uptick in re-pricing activity in June and July.

Media Attachments

Legal Disclosures

Copyright © 2019 by S&P Global Market Intelligence, a division of S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P Global Market Intelligence or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P Global Market Intelligence’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P Global Market Intelligence assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P Global Market Intelligence does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P Global Market Intelligence has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P Global Market Intelligence does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P’s public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

This material is for general information purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. TCW, its officers, directors, employees or clients may have positions in securities or investments mentioned in this publication, which positions may change at any time, without notice. While the information and statistical data contained herein are based on sources believed to be reliable, we do not represent that it is accurate and should not be relied on as such or be the basis for an investment decision. The information contained herein may include preliminary information and/or "forward-looking statements." Due to numerous factors, actual events may differ substantially from those presented. TCW assumes no duty to update any forward-looking statements or opinions in this document. Any opinions expressed herein are current only as of the time made and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. © 2019 TCW